Old 19th December 2000, 23:16   #1
blechma
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1
I took many warnings to heart and skipped downloading Winamp 2.7, as I heard it was very buggy and simply not as good as 2.666.

Now I haven't heard as much complaining about 2.71 - is it a good choice to upgrade my 2.666 to this new version of should I just stick to whats been workin' for me?
blechma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2000, 23:23   #2
monocle
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 80
I found no differences between 2.7 and 2.71. They both had the same problems that cause me to go back to 2.65. I never had 2.666 so I can't compare.
monocle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2000, 23:43   #3
Winsane
Moderator Alumni
 
Winsane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: U.S. (eastern time zone)
Posts: 2,598
In my opinion, 2.71 is the best, 2.65 is second best, and 2.5e is third best. And yes, 2.71 fixes a ton of bugs that were in 2.666 and 2.7.
Winsane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 05:16   #4
terracomm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 12
Send a message via AIM to terracomm
I Humbly Disagree

I use my WinAmps for broadcasting, so perhaps this is superfluous. However, having tried both WinAmp 2.7 and 2.71 and finding them both crashy as hell (though the sound was awesome improvement), I have returned to the fantastically stable version 2.65 - which allows me up-times of between 3 to 7 days in a Win98 enviornment. PEACE and Happy Holidays.
terracomm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 05:26   #5
sgtfuzzbubble011
 
sgtfuzzbubble011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,837
I found that 2.666 and 2.7 were both buggy for me... With that in mind, I upgraded from 2.64 (skipped 2.65) to 2.7 sans the new decoder. I waited until 2.71 until I tried the new decoder because the playlist loading problem had been fixed. Sooo... 2.71 works like a champ!
sgtfuzzbubble011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 05:45   #6
randman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I try all the new versions when released, but I always end up reinstalling 2.5e. It's always been (for me) the most stable. I do use the latest vis_avs.dll and the CDReader plugin though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 06:02   #7
Mr. Ice
Captain Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 763
i've had winamp crash once over all the years i've been using it. and it only died when another program killed every other active program on the machine. damn win98... anywho, winamp has racked up some ridiculous uptimes on my machines over the years. it usually only stops running when the machine goes down for a restart or the occasional hardware upgrade.

/dev/null
Mr. Ice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 14:10   #8
Thor
Major Dude
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Gent, Belgium (Europe)
Posts: 968
Send a message via ICQ to Thor Send a message via AIM to Thor
Every new version is better then the older ones ...

THOR
Thor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 17:24   #9
RacingCaptain
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 140
I had _real_ problems with 2.666 - it crashed as much as anything I've every known (yes, inc. MS), but 2.7 was ok, and 2.71 is perfect - crashed once since I got it when it was first out, and that was probably my 'non-standard' os...
Will 3 be as good? Hope so - the anticipation's making me go crazy......
RacingCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 21:40   #10
flatmatt
Iron Chef
(Reviewer)
 
flatmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Winamp Island
Posts: 3,038
2.65.

flatmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 23:33   #11
Indyrod
Major Dude
 
Indyrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posts: 687
Ignore this please

oops, just fixing a screwup, please ignore.
Indyrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2000, 23:39   #12
Indyrod
Major Dude
 
Indyrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana USA
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally posted by Thor
Every new version is better then the older ones ...

THOR
Guess I mostly agree with that, but there are usually always bugs in new versions. Most of them are because the programmers are trying to make it better, but it's a tough job (considering all the different configurations their users have). I've skipped a few versions, but things are progressing so fast now, that I want to stay "state of the art". Particulary with AVS, which I have an insane interest.
Indyrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2000, 07:41   #13
Extremecriticiser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 141
I'll just compare the crash rate of the ones I've used...

v2.71
Time of usage: a week.
Crashes & freezes: 1
Comment: Improvements, I admit, but frightens me a bit with one crash in just a week of use (AVS went nuts, AVS went bye-bye).

v2.7
Time of usage: 3 weeks
Crashes & freezes: on average 3 times a day
Comment: Vast improvements since the crappy v2.65 (which cuased me to switch completely to Sonique), but new stability problems popped up: most often is when my Norton U complain about OLEThreadWindow whenever I close Winamp.

v2.666
Time of usage: 20 minutes
Crashes & freezes: 2
Comment: After using Sonique for 2 months, I went to find out if Winamp has improved at all, but two crashes in 20 minutes stopped me from playing any audio.

v2.65
Time of usage: 3 1/2 months
Crashes & freezes: 0
Comment: Excellient stability, it used to be my main player till I discovered and was hooked to Sonique.

v2.63
Time of usage: 1/2 month
Crashes & freezes: 3
Comment: Um, well, sorta good-ish stability. The first was when AVS went nuts and froze Winamp, then it repeated a week later, and just before I upgraded to v2.65 the Winamp agent caused a "page fault".
Extremecriticiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2000, 17:08   #14
SNYder
Forum King
 
SNYder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,432
2.71 has been working good for me. 2.7 killed my computer every damn day. I couldnt run it without having to restart.

were can i go to get old version of winamp, like 2.65?

Peace
SNYder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2000, 17:28   #15
sgtfuzzbubble011
 
sgtfuzzbubble011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,837
http://www.winampheaven.com
sgtfuzzbubble011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2000, 19:15   #16
a-arse
Banned
 
a-arse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,711
All the way from 2.5 up to 2.7 winamp was very buggy for me but now I have no problems what-so-ever
a-arse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2000, 19:26   #17
fish
Pretty Cool Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cle, OH, USA
Posts: 4,847
Send a message via AIM to fish
am I blind?

Winamp has never crashed on me, and the only bugs I've even noticed were the flickering pointer and AVS crashing in fullscreen.

/thinks I'm blind

eh, heh.
fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2000, 21:49   #18
gabriel-knight
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 9
I prefer the newest version, which is v2.71.
Winamp never crashes on me no matter which version. But i only use it for playing, not for broadcasting or streaming anything.
gabriel-knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2000, 02:41   #19
ricecake
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 63
Confederacy of Dunces

Quote:
Originally posted by phisherman
When a true Genius appears in the world, you will know him by this sign: all the dunces are in confederacy against him.
-Johnathan Swift
Offtopic, but have you read "A Confederacy of Dunces" by John Kennedy Toole? It's an excellent book.
ricecake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Community Center > General Discussions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump